Welcome to the official website of Jim Brown - NEW COLUMNS appear each Monday!
This site is part of Brown Publications and The Lisburn Press
You are visiting my site on: May 25, 2024

Louisiana politicians should not reapportion!

Jim Brown Audio Player
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...



Thursday, October 1, 2009

Shreveport, Louisiana


It’s getting close to redistricting time for legislators, and already criticism is raining down on this politically sensitive process that decisions are being shaped behind closed doors.  Lawmakers have scheduled a two day “educational workshop” in Alexandria next month to learn the process of divvying up the various political boundaries including congressional, public service commission, and their own legislative districts. But the sessions are not open to the public.   “Wrong!” cry the press and the good government groups.  But the question should be, why are they meeting at all?

By federal law, all election districts must be reapportioned every 10 years to reflect the latest census figures. This puts Louisiana elections officials in a bind knowing that census figures won’t be available until 2011, the same year as the Louisiana gubernatorial election.  So a process does need to be in place so that quick action can be taken once the new census figures are available.  But should legislators, who have a vested interest in how the redistricting lines are drawn, actually do the drawing?

The problem is one of gerrymandering, where district lines are not drawn to reflect geographical or political balance, but to favor the incumbent or some other partisan choice.  When legislators do the redistricting, the norm seems to be that the state ends up with meandering footprints meticulously designed, it would seem,  to ensure that no incumbent will face serious opposition regardless of how the political winds are blowing.  John Maginnis’ weekly column summed the problem up well this week when he concluded:  “Think about it this way.  In elections, people choose their legislators.  In reapportionment, legislators choose their people.”

Gerrymandering, by the way, means to manipulate the electoral boundaries for political gain so as to give undue influence to an incumbent or other favored candidate. The name comes from Massachusetts Governor Elbridge Gerry, who in 1812 created winding districts that looked like salamanders to favor incumbents. Thus the convoluted word of gerrymandering.

What most voters want to avoid is the self dealing by legislators where voting districts slashes across communities of interest and geography.  A blatant example of winding, disjointed gerrymandering is the Louisiana third congressional district.  It winds from the Mississippi border south of New Orleans though the southern part of Jefferson Parish and all the way through south Louisiana up to Lafayette, some 300 miles in length.

California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger is leading an effort in his home state to get the politicians out of the redistricting business.  “The politicians have divided a neighborhood”, he says.  “They have divided cities, towns and people, and this is what we what to eliminate.   And this is why we need redistricting, because the district lines were drawn to favor incumbents rather than to favor the voters.”

So the question for Louisiana voters is this:  Are they that concerned that the legislature is, for all practical purposes, creating their own voters?  Is this healthy in the Bayou State or in any other state ?  Many think it’s not.

“The self-dealing quality of legislators drawing districts for themselves or for their partisans has basically collapsed the enterprise,” says Samuel Issacharoff, a law professor who is an expert on redistricting.  “There’s an increasing sense of revulsion among voters at this self-dealing.  It is somewhat scandalous that there are few competitive elections anymore.”

So what are the alternatives?  What are other progressive states doing to transfer the power of redistricting to a system less driven by self-interest?  Fourteen states have assigned the task to officials or panels outside the state legislature.  And independent redistricting wears the cloak of good-government reform, as long as a consensus can be built on just who will serve on such panels.  How do you pick the members?  How can such a system be put in place that assures voters the final result will be fair, non- partisan, and keep local interests balanced?

There are a number of bright people in Louisiana with solid business and educational backgrounds that are capable of taking on this controversial task.  There are several respected demographers in the state, and a number of well qualified professors at Louisiana universities.  Retired judges fit the category as well as representatives of some of the state’s good government groups.

When I was first elected to the Louisiana legislature back in 1971, legislative redistricting had taken place just months before.  But the reapportionment plan did not pass federal court muster, and was thrown out just weeks before the primary election date.  Ed Steimel was head of the Public Affairs Research Council at the time, and was appointed by federal judge Frank Polozola to serve as a “special master” to redraw the district lines.  Based on Steimel’s rework, the old plan was thrown out and the new court ordered plan put in place.  There was general agreement that the Steimel Plan was fair and kept district more cohesive and less spread out. (It must have been good as I won my senate seat easily in the first primary.)

One idea would be to create a Louisiana Fair Reapportionment Practices Commission made up from a cross section of various recommendations.  Let nominations come from the legislature, the Supreme Court, the good government groups like PAR and CABL, the various college boards, and perhaps a key business group or two.  Then put all the submissions in a hat, and draw out eleven names to serve as members to begin their work right after the new census data is made available.

The goal for such a commission is simple ““ put the important issue of redistricting into the hands of less vested interests instead of those who in the past have been allowed to define the terms of their own cartel. Simply put, it’s just wrong for legislators to draw these districts and then run in them.  There needs to be a better way.


“If you’re hanging around with nothing to do and the zoo is closed, come over to the legislature. You’ll get the same kind of feeling and you won’t have to pay.”     Sen. Dudley LeBlanc

Peace and Justice

Jim Brown   Jim Brown’s weekly column appears in numerous newspapers and websites throughout the south.  To read past columns going back to 2002, go to www.jimbrownla.com.  

5 Responses
  1. Kinnon Thomas

    Jim is right on target here. We have the very same problem in Florida as well. But there is an effort underway headed by a former candidate for statewide office to come up with a much less partisan approach to carving up “equal” districts. Hopefully that campaign will be successful. And hopefully Jim’s words this week will be read by those who could help make it happen.

  2. Angelique LaCour

    While the 3rd Congressional District is certainly a good example of the ridiculous carving up of districts, it’s important to point out that the reapportionment carving is designed for state legislative districts and Congressional Districts emerge from that design. Maginnis is so right when he says that this whole process is designed for legislators to choose their own voters. The good news is that when word got out about the planned “closed door” meetings enough furor was raised to nip that in the bud and now the public needs to make their voices heard and let their legislators know that they want natural boundaries that meet the common needs of the district’s constituents. In Folsom there are places where folks on one side of the street have a different legislator than their neighbors on the other side. How crazy is that?

  3. Rose Mary

    This is definitely a test of ethics and integrity, is it not? I believe that the whole process should be watched very closely by voters. Enough of the “closed door meetings”. This is after all our Louisiana and our USA. But without the voters use of their voices, it will vanish soon.

  4. Hardy Parkerson

    The squirrel hunter Jim brown:/
    Most talented guy in town./
    Knows the rich and famous, the best;/
    What’s more, he knows the rest.

Leave a Reply