Welcome to the official website of Jim Brown - NEW COLUMNS appear each Monday!
This site is part of Brown Publications and The Lisburn Press
You are visiting my site on: June 19, 2024

Louisiana Left Out of Presidential Mix

Jim Brown Audio Player
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...

Thursday, October 30th, 2008

Baton Rouge, Louisiana



Louisiana voters are gearing up for election day in record numbers.  Spurred on by the presidential election,   more than one quarter of a million people cast absentee ballots which is an all-time record.  And for good reason.  This is certainly one of the most important elections in modern history.  But if you live in Louisiana, your vote is looked on as irrelevant to the process.  Your sway on who will win American Idol has more influence than who will be the next president of the United States.

Louisiana has been written off as a “red state,” which means, for all practical purposes, your vote does not count.  You might as well write in “none of the above” or leave a hanging chad.  Why?  Look no further than the Electoral College.  We are  about to elect our country’s and the world’s most powerful leader, but the system we have in place causes us to abdicate our right to have our vote count.

Under the present system, the Electoral College rules require that all the state’s electoral votes go to the winner, no matter how close the election might have been.  If, for example, Obama gets 45% of the Louisiana votes, he still gets 0% of the Louisiana electoral votes.  If McCain ends up winning by one vote in Louisiana, he receives all of Louisiana’s electoral votes.  In fact, it is mathematically possible for one of the candidates to get 49% of the popular vote and 100% of electoral votes.  Go figure.

  Right now, there are fewer than 10 competitive “battleground” states that are receiving the focus and the money from the presidential candidates. In a state like Louisiana, where McCain will easily win, or a state like New York, where Obama is a cinch, why even vote for president?  All of the electoral delegates get assigned to the winner, and we know who the winner is going to be, so your vote for president, for all practical purposes, has been taken away.

 Now when it comes to other statewide races on the ballot, like Governor or U.S. Senator, strangely enough, we use the popular vote. So what is so important about having the electoral vote system that allows Louisiana voters and the voters in the majority of the states in this country to be disenfranchised in a presidential election?  An idiosyncratic system that on four occasions in our nation’s history has created a quagmire where the winner of the largest number of popular votes did not win the largest number of electoral votes, and therefore did not become president.  Remember some guy named Al Gore?

The system in place was confected in the early days of the republic by our founders, where electors were supposed to be independent agents exercising their best judgment in choosing a presidential candidate from a list of several contenders. Why?  Because the Framers of the Constitution, our Founding Fathers, the champions of democracy, did not trust the voters to make an intelligent choice.  Check out these quotes from the Constitutional Convention of 1787.

  “The extent of the country renders a popular vote impossible, that the people can have the requisite capacity to judge of the respective pretensions of the candidates.”Â  Delegate Mason, July 17, 1787.

“A popular election in this case is radically vicious. The ignorance of the people would put it in the power of some one set of men and throughout the Union, and acting in concert, to delude them into any appointment.”Â  Delegate Gerry.  July 25, 1787.

“The people are uninformed, and would be misled by a few designing men.”Â  Delegate Johnson, July 19, 1787.

So what this all comes down to is that the Founding Fathers were trying their best to insulate the selection of the president from the whims of the public.  They didn’t trust voters then and the system does not trust you now to make your choice. So because of conservative political persuasions, Louisiana is left out of any serious attention from the presidential candidates.

Since receiving their respective nominations, neither McCain nor Obama have set foot in Louisiana.  Neither candidate has said a word about hurricane recovery, wetlands protection, or supporting a larger percentage of oil and gas revenues for the state off the Louisiana coast.  From each of their perspectives, Louisiana issues are irrelevant in the current campaign.  Their just is no political capital to gain by either coming to or speaking about the Bayou State.

By being so out of the mix, just what else is Louisiana missing?  How about the lack of all that attention?  No knocks on the door by college students from out of state with leaflets about what an old, unhealthy guy John McCain is.  No robo-calls in the middle of dinner telling you that Barack Obama is a terrorist.  And no presidential TV ads.   In Louisiana, you are left out of the national political bombardment that is taking place in the likes of Ohio, Pennsylvania and Florida where those voters are taught that McCain is a Bush clone and that Obama will socialize the country.  Besides those paid for by state and local candidates, all we get are ads about bladder control and erectile dysfunction.

There are a number of reforms being considered for future elections.  A proportional electorial vote by congressional districts is as compromise solution that makes sense.  In the meantime, don’t forget to go vote for a number of candidates and propositions on the ballot next Tuesday.  Your vote might make the difference in many of these local and state races.  That is except for President.  In this election, you really are irrelevant.


“We’ve said it before, and we’ll say it again – the American Electoral College system sucks.
The Daily Iowan
The Daily Iowan.  (23 Sept 2004).  Editorial/Opinion.  “Long past time to fix Electoral College.”

Peace and Justice

Jim Brown

Jim Brown’s column appears weekly, and is published in a number of newspapers and websites throughout Louisiana.  You can read past columns by going to Jim’s website at www.jimbrownla.com.     Jim’s regular radio show on WRNO, 995fm out of New Orleans can be heard each Sunday from 11:00 am till 1:00 pm.








4 Responses
  1. DeWayne Guice

    In regards to the electorial college.. I have no regards, I feel it is unfair and the majority should rule.

  2. Keith dunlieth

    The electoral college is a basiic element of a federal system. The basic units for voting for president are the indiviidual states, not the nation as a whole. If the opposite were true, the hordes of Democrat voters in California, Illinois, New York, and Pennsylvania (including many illegal aliens) could elect all presidents. The electoral college seems unfair to those who are ignorant of the structure of the constitution. Upon closer analysis, it is the best syetem for electing a national CEO.

  3. Gregory Reggie

    Hi Jim:
    There is an organization working to get legislatures around the country to pass “model bills” to have their respective states’ electoral votes go to the top NATIONWIDE popular-vote-getter in the presidential election—-with the law to take effect once states totaling 270 electoral votes (the amount needed to elect the president) pass the bill. Then, the top nationwide popular-vote-getter would instantly win enough electoral votes to win. A few states have already passed it. Others are considering it. It’s an interesting idea. Here’s their website that explains it further and lets you follow the progress of the movement. http://www.nationalpopularvote.com/

  4. Rose Mary

    Hi Grandpa-to-be,again). The electoral college has outlived its usefulness. With all the means the public has to research, ponder, and make decisions we are no longer obligated to accept any info just becaue the NY Tmes prints it.(or CBS says it). I resent not having my opinion as voiced by my vote count on EVERY issue.

Leave a Reply