Jim Brown Audio Player
Getting your Trinity Audio player ready...
|
Thursday, June 19th, 2008
DOES
A FULL TIME LEGISLATURE?
(I wonder how the
                                                                    ******
“No man’s life, liberty, or property is safe while the legislature is in session.”
Mark Twain
Peace and Justice.
Jim Brown’s column appears weekly, and is published in a number of newspapers and on websites throughout
.
I completely disagree. I have often called my old represenative (James David Cain) to help clear up issues with the state bureaucracy. He spent many hours contacting the right people and acting as “my represenative” in the state government. I was not asking for any special favors. I only wanted the state to clear up its’ own mistakes. He was my advocate, despite the legislature not being in session. Nope, I don’t ever recall contributing to any of his campaigns, so he didn’t owe me anything but a part time effort. He did however, go beyond the part time job classification and resolved several extremely disturbing mistakes made by the several state agencies. I want to be represented that way in government. It is true that I probably could have resolved the issues over a period of several months or a year and a lot of legal fees but I found it most encouraging to see my represenative actually “represent me”, instead of hiring attorneys. Perhaps other citizens have not had the fortune to see how well their own represenative can actually “represent”.
I agree Jim. I think they spend too much time down there and government keeps growing and growing. Most of the money is dedicated to certain funds and the can’t touch it. My personal opinion is that we need to scrap the Constitution (all 15 gazillion pages) and start from scratch.
I am loath to back up Tucker but … he never supported a 300% pay raise. That’s a quadrulpling of pay. No one in this process ever supported QUADRUPLING the salary. Tucker spoke up for a doubling (or a 100% increase) … down from tripling (or a 200% increase).
Jim, it would be nice if the voters of Louisiana had the same right to put items on the ballet like California has. We need a constitutional amendment to reduce legislative sessions to once every 2 years, the same as Texas. I agree with Mark Twain, our liberty is not safe as long as the Louisiana Legislature is in session. Too many silly laws are enacted, and most of the session is foolishness.
Thanks,
Don W.
I ONLY NEED SAY ONE THING. NO MAN SHOULD BE ALLOWED TO VOTE ON HIS OWN PAY RAISE AT THE EXPENSE OF OTHERS.!!!!!!!!!!PERIOD.
Ditto’s to your comments Jim!! We DON’T NEED full time Legislators but LIMITED GOVERNMENT. This issue is a prime example of just how ‘out of touch’ they are and ‘full of themselves’ at the same time. Their true colors showed through with all of their waiving of procedures to get this through session. DISAPPOINTING!
base pay for a state legislator in texas is $7200/ year
Because of these full-time facists in Baton Rouge, I’m making plans to leave this state. I was born and reared here and everytime I listen to a newscast I hear that the “law” makers are passing laws, making life MORE difficult for the people of this state. I understand the state bird is going to be replaced by pick a finger!
THIS ACTION IS NOT SUBJECT SPECIFIC FOR ONLY A SEGMENT OF THE PUBLIC(VOTERS)INTERESTED IN SUBJECTS SUCH AS THE ENVIROMENT, EDUCATION OR BETTER HIGHWAYS THIS TRANSCENDS THE ENTIRE POPULACE-YOUNG,OLD WEALTHY,POOR ON DOWN THE LINE. THIS MAY BE THE MOST INTERESTING “OFF SEASON” EVER IN THE “FULL CONTACT SPORT” CALLED LOUISIANA POLITICS.THE CAMPAIGN “ISSUE” FOR THE NEXT ELECTION HAS ALREADY BEEN DECIDED.
On pay raise of State Reps and Senators.
Since the people who pay taxes are the ones that furnish the money to run the state and it is the people of Louisiana that vote for the elected senators and representatives, how did the people give up the right to decide if a pay raise would be in order?
Should there be a bill put before the public for voting to determine if the people should have the right to determine if a pay raise is in order for Senators and Reps.
It seems that it would be prudent to allow the people that furnish the money to determine if a raise is in order for the employees of the people, namely the Senators and Representatives.
In the private sector the ones that pay out the money determine how much is paid out for the labor furnished. It would seem that this rule should be followed in our legislature also. I will vote for my representative if he will accept a salary of $30,000 per year.
When one runs for an office, he should state what salary he will accept if he is elected.
Properly structured compensation is one of the best drivers of behavior there is. What if:
Why don’t we consider some of the following options:
1. Use the Moon Griffon model – leave pay where it is now and change to every other year sessions.
2. Freeze pay at current levels and cut length of sessions from current maximum of 85 days (?) to 60 days in effect providing a 30% increase.
3. Freeze pay but guarantee pay raises when they meet and reduce the number of laws by ____ %
4. Freeze pay but pay a bonus when they reduce the # of bills introduced below 2,500 in any session.
5. Raise pay but require for every new law passed they must remove two antiquated laws.
6. Freeze pay and give an increase in expense allowances (all uses) and allow them to keep half of what they don’t’ spend – the rest of the savings goes back to the state.
7. Raise pay to their desired level but REMOVE all other perks – OGB, Retirement, free offices or subsidized housing (let them pay rent for the space they want), AND DO NOT ALLOW TIME IN THE LEGISLATURE TO COUNT TOWARDS other Retirement systems.
8. We could even offer “Pay for Performance†(a ___ % increase each time the state moved up in ranking against some index (to be determined) of important measures (education performance, taxes, health measures, household income, etc.
9. Maybe for a select group we could offer a pay raise if they didn’t come to the session. We could use your Best and Worse list to define that group.
I could go on but I won’t. Consider sponsoring a contest (The prize could be a night at the Governor’s Suite in the refurbished Capitol House) for the best pay raise alternative!
I’d welcome your feedback.